The choice: assistants and agents are better for multi-step, system-aware work; chatbots are fine for FAQs and triage. In regulated UAE workflows, the difference is guardrails and human oversight.
1) When to use chatbots
- Low-risk FAQs with citations from approved knowledge bases.
- First-touch triage for support, routing to humans on low confidence.
- Pre-screening forms before handoff to an assistant/agent.
2) When to use assistants/agents
- Finance: reconciliation drafts, variance explanations with human sign-off.
- Ops: ticket summarization, vendor comms drafts, exception handling.
- Support: multi-turn troubleshooting that pulls from systems with RBAC.
3) Human-in-loop patterns
- Tiered validation: auto (low risk), approve (ops comms), co-create (finance/clinical).
- Audit trails: log prompt/model/version; watermark outputs with time/source.
- Data safety: retrieval restricted to approved sources; PII masked before inference.
4) Governance for UAE enterprises
- In-region hosting; vendor allowlist; failover model defined.
- SSO/MFA; least privilege; no hardcoded keys.
- Red-team before launch and on prompt/model updates.
5) Success metrics
- Chatbots: resolution %, deflection, CSAT, escalation rate, citation coverage.
- Assistants/agents: cycle-time delta, hours removed, error/appeal rate, payback days.
- Adoption: human-touch %, active users, opt-outs.
Bottom line: use chatbots for safe triage and FAQs; assistants/agents for system-aware work with human gates. Wrap both with auditability and in-region controls.